User talk:Jl FilpoC

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Jl FilpoC!
File:Retrato de Emili Fontbona (Louis Rodolphe Fornerod).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 11:08, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Filpo. I don't understand this change, what are you trying to do? There's only one district called Triana, but within Triana District there are 3 neighbourhoods which contain Triana: Triana Casco Antiguo, Triana Este and Triana Oeste, as you can see in the following links:

Regards, tyk (talk) 17:59, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

El famoso barrio de Triana en Sevilla es un distrito de la capital, por lo que es una subcategoría de Districts of Seville. Creo correcto la categorización Geography of Seville - Districts of Seville - Triana (Seville). Queda diferenciado de la categoría Triana, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. Saludos Jl FilpoC (talk) 20:16, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sí, pero no hay que diferenciar el distrito del barrio o barrios de Triana, por lo que el nombre "Triana District" es necesario. Si quieres puedes crear una categoría para los barrios oficiales: Triana Casco Antiguo, Triana Este y Triana Oeste. Son los que el ayuntamiento reconoce oficialmente. Un saludo, tyk (talk) 18:22, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Quedo conforme Jl FilpoC (talk) 19:18, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:La Magdalena, Catedral de Sevilla.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 11:20, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Olivenza[edit]

Buenas tardes Jl FilpoC. Me he percatado que hace unos años en la categoría de Olivenza retiraste, de forma totalmente comprensible, algunas categorías fuera de lugar y que cierto usuario te revirtió en varias ocasiones. Decirte que creo que tenías toda la razón. El caso es que son varios los usuarios a lo largo de los años los que han chocado contra el mismo muro, un único usuario que ha tomado posesión de la categoría como si fuera su feudo particular. Y que además roza el ridículo al integrar Olivenza en la región del Alentejo y le da rango de municipio luso. Yo he estado categorizando imágenes de la citada categoría (que estaba muy abandonada), al tiempo que he puesto orden en el tema de las categorías no puede ser que un usuario tenga secuestrado esto como si fuera su cortijo personal. CFA1877 (talk) 16:25, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Historias de Mafalda, Quino.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Not own work, comic strip by Quino
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Günther Frager (talk) 20:33, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:L'Avis de chien de Bill, Boule et Bill.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kokonino (talk) 09:48, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Olivenza[edit]

Buenas noches. Pongo en tu conocimiento este tema que he denunciado en el tablón de administradores, dado que apareces mencionado en el mismo. CFA1877 (talk) 19:59, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bueno, pues comentarte que se llevó el asunto al tablón de administradores y después de mucha discusión se ha acabado alcanzando un nuevo consenso sobre las categorías. Algo es algo. Saludos cordiales. CFA1877 (talk) 21:56, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ocasión para saludarle cordialmente. Jl FilpoC (talk) 07:09, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Muy bien. Saludos Jl FilpoC (talk) 16:39, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Por favor[edit]

Deje de etiquetar imágenes como "trabajo propio" a menos que en realidad sean su propio trabajo. Tomar una fotografía del trabajo de otra persona no lo convierte en tu trabajo. Cada una de tus cargas deberá ser reparada; Es posible que sea necesario eliminar algunos de ellos. DS (talk) 20:23, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Buenos días: No entiendo el aviso. Todas mis fotografías las capto con mi máquina y no utilizo las fotografías de otro. Entiendo por "trabajo propio" que la fotografía es captada y procesada por mi. Le agradecería un ejemplo para tener conocimiento del asunto. Saludos Jl FilpoC (talk) 09:08, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Si tomo una fotografía de un dibujo que hiciste, ¿se convierte inmediatamente en mi imagen? (No es asi.) Las fotografías de estatuas son diferentes. 100 personas podrían tomar 100 fotografías diferentes de 1 estatua desde 100 ángulos diferentes, y todas serían muy, muy diferentes. Pero una buena fotografía de un cuadro es funcionalmente equivalente al cuadro mismo. DS (talk) 15:10, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:Male Call, Milton Caniff.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DS (talk) 20:38, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No tengo información de que sea una reproducción del original. Se expone en 9e Art Références. Saludos Jl FilpoC (talk) 12:25, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Por favor publica tu comentario aquí. DS (talk) 15:52, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sin objeción al borrado Jl FilpoC (talk) 17:17, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Error en descripción[edit]

Hola, tanto esta imagen, como esta otra esta otra corresponden al Monasterio de Leyre. Por favor corrígelo. Saludos Mar del Sur (talk) 11:18, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Buenas tardes. No encuentro error en el archivo Panorámica del Monasterio de Leyre Jl FilpoC (talk) 18:35, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kubla Khan, Frank Frazetta.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kubla Khan, Frank Frazetta.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Belbury (talk) 16:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]